Sprayable coating composition and method for asphalt surfaces

ABSTRACT

A sprayable coating composition, and method of application, for coating asphalt paving surfaces. In the coating composition, a low bulk density aggregate material of sprayable particle size is suspended in a sprayable asphalt emulsion in an amount sufficient to increase the micro-texture surface roughness of the cured coating.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.14/299,493, filed on Jun. 9, 2014, and claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/838,494, filed Jun. 24, 2013, andincorporates the same herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to sprayable asphalt and aggregatecompositions and methods for coating roads, parking lots, and otherdriving surfaces.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is well known that, for asphalt parking lots, a preventativemaintenance treatment (typically an asphalt coating composition referredto as a “sealer”) will commonly be applied to the paving surface every2-5 years or so. The coating material will typically be comprised ofliquid asphalt or an anionic asphalt emulsion and will be applied usinga wand sprayer or a spraying machine. The coating desirably operates to(a) seal the surface from water intrusion, (b) improve the appearance ofthe pavement, (c) protect the underlying asphalt pavement from oxidationand UV damage, (d) protect the pavement from oil and gasoline spills,and (e) provide a surface which is easier to sweep, clean, shovel, andmaintain. All of these benefits increase the service life of thepavement.

Unfortunately, after curing, the micro-texture of the asphalt spraycoatings heretofore known in the art has been much smoother than themicro-texture of the underlying pavement surface so that the frictionalresistance offered by the asphalt spray coating has been significantlyless than that of the underlying pavement. This reduction in frictionalresistance is not a concern in low speed environments. However, becauseof this significant loss in surface frictional resistance, asphalt spraymaintenance coatings of this type have not been applied to asphalt roadsurfaces or to other asphalt paving surfaces upon which vehicles will betraveling at higher speeds.

Moreover, no successful means of modifying and significantly increasingthe micro-texture roughness and surface frictional resistance of thecured spray coating has heretofore been provided. Typical sealers arenot formulated with a viscosity to suspend the typical aggregates chosento enhance friction in other typical paving applications. The frictionalaggregates used in other applications derive their frictionalcharacteristics from both larger particles which cannot be sprayed andfrom material properties chosen with a maximum value of hardness anddensity.

Consequently, a need exists for an improved sprayable asphalt andaggregate coating composition which (a) will provide a significantlyincrease degree of surface micro-texture roughness when cured, (b)preferably will not have a lower surface micro-texture roughness thanthe underlying pavement to which it is applied, (c) can be spray-appliedusing conventional equipment, (d) will be highly durable, (e) willprovide improved micro-texture over the life of the spray coating, (f)will provide all of the other benefits of a superior parking lot sealcoating, and (g) can be pre-mixed, stored, and transported for lateruse.

The micro-texture roughness of an asphalt surface can be measured, forexample, using a Dynamic Friction Test (DFT) as set forth in ASTM E1911. This test provides a measure of surface friction as a function ofsliding speed. The DFT apparatus consists of a horizontal spinning diskfitted with a spring-loaded rubber slider that contacts the pavedsurface as the rotational speed decreases due to the friction generatedbetween the slider and the paved surface. The measured torque generatedby the slider force is used to calculate a surface friction value as afunction of speed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a sprayable asphalt and aggregate coatingcomposition, and method of application, which satisfy the needs andalleviate the problems discussed above. The inventive sprayable coatingcomposition is an easily stored, shipped, and applied fluid asphalt andaggregate composition which includes a fine, low bulk density aggregatematerial, that is surprisingly and unexpectedly effective for increasingthe surface micro-texture roughness of the coating while also providinghigh durability. Moreover, the significant improvement in surfacemicro-texture provided by the inventive sprayable coating is such that,not only does the inventive composition provide superior performance asa spray sealer for asphalt parking lots, but can be used as amaintenance coating on asphalt roads and other asphalt pavement surfacesused for high speed vehicle traffic.

The inventive sprayable coating composition for asphalt paving surfacespreferably comprises: (a) a sprayable asphalt emulsion and (b) anaggregate material having an AASHTO T-19 loose bulk unit weight of notmore than 115 pounds per cubic foot or an aggregate material having anASTM C-29 loose bulk unit weight of not more than 115 pounds per cubicfoot. It is to be understood that either the international standard ASTMC-29 could be used to measure the weight in pounds per cubic foot or theAASHTO T-19 standard could be used to measure the weight in pounds percubic foot. The aggregate material is preferably suspended in thesprayable asphalt emulsion in an amount of from about 9% to about 27% byweight of the total final weight of the sprayable coating composition.In addition, it is also preferred that the sprayable asphalt emulsioncomprise a cationic asphalt emulsion and that the size of the aggregatematerial be sufficiently fine that 100% of the aggregate material willpass a number 16 US sieve.

Further aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention willbe apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon examining theaccompanying Drawings and upon reading the following DetailedDescription of the Preferred Embodiments.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates the Dynamic Friction Test (DFT) results achieved bythe coating compositions prepared and tested as described below inExample 1.

FIG. 2 illustrates the Dynamic Friction Test (DFT) results achieved bythe coating compositions prepared and tested as described below inExample 2.

FIG. 3 illustrates the Dynamic Friction Test (DFT) results achieved bythe coating compositions prepared and tested as described below inExample 3.

FIG. 4 illustrates the Dynamic Friction Test (DFT) results achieved bythe coating compositions prepared and tested as described below inExample 4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides a sprayable coating composition, and amethod of application, for spray sealing or spray coating all manner ofasphalt parking, driving or walking surfaces.

The inventive sprayable coating composition for asphalt pavementsurfaces preferably comprises: (a) a sprayable asphalt emulsion and (b)an aggregate material having an AASHTO T-19 loose bulk unit weight ofless than 90 pounds per cubic foot. It is to be understood that eitherthe international standard ASTM C-29 could be used to measure the weightin pounds per cubic foot or the AASHTO T-19 standard could be used todetermine the weight in pounds per cubic foot throughout thisapplication. Preferably, 100% of the aggregate material will pass a #16US sieve. Also, the aggregate material is preferably suspended in thesprayable asphalt emulsion in an amount of from about 9% to about 27% byweight of the total final weight of the sprayable coating composition.

In addition, the sprayable asphalt emulsion preferably has thixotropicproperties effective such that the aggregate material will remainsuspended in the sprayable asphalt emulsion from the time that thefrictional sealer composition is manufactured, shipped, andspray-applied to the pavement surface until the frictional sealercomposition has set.

The sized and graded aggregate material used in the inventive coatingcomposition provides the micro-texture in the finished pavement membraneto increase the measured dynamic friction of the coating. Our discoveryof the correct specific gravity, bulk gravity, size, gradation andgeometry play a significant role in providing a sprayable coatingcomposition that can be applied in a practical manner and generate thedesired surface micro-texture properties.

Surprisingly, rather than being a very hard material having a high bulkunit density, we have discovered that the aggregate material effectivefor improving the surface micro-texture of the inventive spray coatingis an aggregate material which, as mentioned above, has a lower AASHTOT-19 Loose Bulk Density. This aggregate material is able to remain insuspension from the time that the inventive spray coating composition ismanufactured, shipped, and applied until it has been allowed to set andcure. As a result, a significant proportion of the suspended aggregatematerial becomes bound at the coating surface.

In addition, because the amount of aggregate material which can be addedto a sprayable asphalt composition is generally limited by weight, thelower bulk density of the aggregate material used in the inventivecomposition also allows a greater volume amount of the aggregate to beincluded in the composition, thus further increasing both the amount ofaggregate material which can be suspended in the inventive coatingcomposition and the number of particles which ultimately become bound atthe coating surface.

The aggregate material used in the inventive coating compositionpreferably has an AASHTO T-19 loose bulk weight of from 45 to 90 poundsper cubic foot. The loose bulk weight of the material is more preferablyin the range of from about 55 pounds per cubic foot to about 85 poundsper cubic foot and is most preferably in the range of from about toabout 55 pounds to 84 pounds per cubic foot. In addition, the aggregatematerial will also preferably have an AASHTO T-19 rodded (i.e., packed)bulk unit weight which is not more than 98 pounds for cubic foot and ismore preferably in the range of from about 66 pounds per cubic foot toabout 94 pounds per cubic foot.

The aggregate material also preferably has a fine particle sizedistribution wherein 100% by weight of the material will pass a number16 US sieve and only less than 20% by weight will pass a number 200 USsieve. Most preferably, the aggregate is a graded material having aparticle size distribution wherein: (a) 100% by weight of the gradedaggregate material will pass a number #16 US sieve and (b) a maximum of5% by weight of the graded aggregate material will pass a number #200 USsieve.

Examples of aggregate materials preferred for use in the inventivesprayable coating composition include, but are not limited to, expandedcalcined slate, calcined shale, crushed boiler slag, crushed trap rock,or a combination thereof. The aggregated material will most preferablybe fractured expanded calcined slate.

As noted above, the aggregate material will preferably be present in theinventive sprayable coating composition in an amount in the range offrom about 9% to about 27% by weight of the total final weight of thecomposition. The amount of aggregate material used will more preferablybe from about 11% to about 25% by weight and will most preferably beabout 18% by weight of the total final weight of the spray coatingcomposition.

In the inventive coating, the sprayable asphalt emulsion composition inwhich the aggregate material is suspended comprises an asphalt emulsion.The asphalt emulsion will preferably be a cationic asphalt emulsion. Inaddition, the sprayable asphalt emulsion composition will alsopreferably comprise one or more, or all, of the following components:

1) Clay,

2) Mineral Filler,

3) Polymer Latex,

4) Rheological enhancers and stabilizers,

5) Biocide or preservative, and/or

6) Water

The inventive sprayable coating composition is formulated to allowtransport, storage and application with equipment typical of thepavement sealer industry. As will be understood by those in the art, theasphalt emulsion provides the primary carrier for the binder allowingthe coating composition to adhere to the pavement, protect the surfacefrom environmental degradation, and anchor the frictional aggregate tothe pavement surface.

The clay component can be a non-expansive or an expansive clay. The clayprovides a means of suspending the asphalt emulsion and aggregatemixture, as well as other components, in a thixotropic (shear thinning)fluid that prevents rapid separation while still allowing the materialto be pumped, sprayed and applied without excessive effort. The clayalso plays a role in the dried coating membrane by increasing stiffnessand reducing the tendency to track and deform under traffic.

Mineral filler can be used to provide an additional reinforcement of thedried sealer membrane.

Polymer latex, or lattices, can be used to significantly increase thestiffness and toughness of the finished asphalt coating membrane and toreduce the tendency of the coating to soften under high pavementtemperatures.

Rheological enhancers and stabilizers may be employed to provide and/orsustain the thixotropic property of the sealer in storage, transport andapplication and to thereby prevent separation of the components.

The biocide or preservative component prevents or reduces biologicalgrowth that may occur within the coating, thus reducing the likelihoodof product degradation and odor generation.

In the application method of the present invention, the inventivecoating composition can be applied using a conventional wand sprayer, aconventional sealer spray machine, or other conventional equipment.

The following examples are meant to illustrate, but in no way limit, theclaimed invention.

Example 1

Three inventive cationic asphalt spray-coating compositions comprising11% by weight, 18% by weight, and 25% by weight of Black Magnum 30(BM30) aggregate material were prepared for testing. The BM30 was afinely crushed boiler slag material formed of carbonate silica. The BM30had an AASHTO T-19 loose bulk unit weight of 79 pounds per cubic foot,an AASHTO T-19 rodded bulk unit weight of 90 pounds per cubic foot, anda graded particle size distribution wherein 100% of the material passeda number #16 US sieve and less than 1% of the material passed a number#200 US sieve.

The identities and relative amounts of the other components of the 11wt. % composition were: 34.9 wt. % Water, 29 wt. % CSS-1HH, 18 wt. %Dunn B Ball Clay, 2.0 wt. % Carbon, 5.0 wt. % Tegra GT, and 0.06 wt. %PCMX Biocide. The same non-aggregate components and the same relativeparts by weight proportions of the non-aggregate components as used onthe 11% aggregate composition were also used in the 18% and 25%aggregate compositions.

The three coating compositions were each applied to an asphalt pavementsurface which, prior to coating, had an ASTM E 1911 Dynamic FrictionTest (DFT) value of 0.50 @ 20 Km/h. As explained above, this test, whichis used to evaluate the micro-texture roughness of a surface, provides ameasure of surface friction as a function of sliding speed.

After application and drying, the surface micro-texture of each of thethree BM30 test compositions was also evaluated using the ASTM E 1911DFT procedure. The results of these tests are illustrated in FIG. 1. Themeasured DFT values after application were 0.37 @ 20 Km/h for the 11 wt.% BM30 coating, 0.42 @ 20 Km/h for the 18 wt. % BM30 coating, and 0.50 @20 Km/h for the 25 wt. % BM30 coating. Thus, significant recovery of thelost micro-texture caused by the non-aggregate components of the asphaltemulsion was achieved by adding 18 wt. % of the BM30 aggregate and fullrecovery of the original micro-texture surface friction value wasachieved at a BM30 concentration of 25 wt. %.

Example 2

Five inventive coating compositions containing 5 wt. %, 8 wt. %, 11 wt.%, 18 wt. % and 25 wt. % aggregate material were prepared, applied andtested in the same manner as described in Example 1 except that theaggregate material used in these coating compositions was Buildex-1/16(BX). The results of the tests for the BX (Buildex 1/16) aggregatematerial are illustrated in FIG. 2.

The BX aggregate material had an AASHTO T-19 loose bulk unit weight of58 pounds per cubic foot and an AASHTO T-19 rodded bulk unit weight of64 pounds per cubic foot. The BX aggregate material also had a gradedparticle size distribution wherein 100% of the material passed a 1/16″US sieve.

The pavement surface used for testing had an uncoated DFT value of 0.50@ 20 Km/h. After application and drying, the measured DFT values of thecoatings were 0.37 @ 20 Km/h for the 5 wt. % BX coating, 0.44 @ 20 Km/hfor the 8 wt. % BX coating, 0.42 @ 20 Km/h for the 11 wt. % BX coating,0.51 @ 20 Km/h for the 18 wt. % BX coating, and 0.56 @ 20 Km/h for the25 wt. % BX coating. Thus, significant recovery of the lostmicro-texture caused by the non-aggregate components of the asphaltemulsion was achieved at by adding just 8-11 wt. % of the BX aggregateand full recovery of the original micro-texture surface friction valuewas achieved at a BX concentration of 18 wt. %.

Example 3

Three inventive coating compositions containing 11 wt. %, 18 wt. % and25 wt. % aggregate material were prepared, applied and tested in thesame manner as described in Example 1 except that the aggregate materialused in these coating compositions was TXI. The results of the tests forthe TXI material are illustrated in FIG. 3.

The TXI aggregate material was formed of fractured, expanded, calcinedslate and had an AASHTO T-19 loose unit weight of 57 pounds per cubicfoot, and a rodded loose weight of 66 pounds per cubic foot. The TXIaggregate material also had a graded particle size distribution whichpassed a number 16 US sieve and 19.6% of the material passed a number200 US sieve.

The pavement surface use for testing had an uncoated DFT value of 0.50 @20 Km/h. After application and drying, the measured DFT values of thecoatings were 0.42 @ 20 Km/h for the 11 wt. % TXI coating, 0.53 @ 20Km/h for the 18 wt. % TXI coating, and 0.55 @ 20 Km/h for the 25 wt. %TXI coating. Thus, significant recovery of the lost micro-texture causedby the non-aggregate components of the asphalt emulsion was achieved byadding just 11 wt. % of the TXI aggregate. Moreover, the micro-texturesurface friction value at a TXI concentration of 18 wt. % exceeded theDFT value of the original, uncoated asphalt pavement.

Example 4

Two inventive coating compositions containing 11 wt. % and 18 wt. %aggregate material were prepared, applied and tested in the same manneras described in Example 1 except that the aggregate material used inthese coating compositions was another batch of TXI material which willbe referred to as TXR. The results of the tests for the TXR material areillustrated in FIG. 4.

The TXR aggregate material was also formed of fractured, expanded,calcined slate. The TXR material had an AASHTO T-19 loose bulk unitweight of 57 pounds per cubic foot and an AASHTO T-19 rodded bulk unitweight of 66 pounds per cubic foot. In addition, the TXR aggregatematerial had a graded particle size distribution which passed a number16 US sieve and 19.6% of the material passed a number 200 US sieve.

The pavement surface use for testing had an uncoated DFT value ofbetween 0.69-0.70 @ 20 Km/h. After application and drying, the measuredDFT values of the coatings were 0.56 @ 20 Km/h for the 11 wt. % TXRcoating and 0.73 @ 20 Km/h for the 18 wt. % TXR coating. Thus, onceagain, significant recovery of the lost micro-texture caused by thenon-aggregate asphalt emulsion components was achieved by adding just 11wt. % of the TXR aggregate and full recovery was obtained at a TXIconcentration of 18 wt. %

Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects andattain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherenttherein. While presently preferred embodiments have been described forpurposes of this disclosure, numerous changes and modifications will beapparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such changes andmodifications are encompassed within this invention as defined by theclaims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A sprayable coating composition for asphaltpaving surfaces comprising: a sprayable asphalt emulsion and anaggregate material, wherein said aggregate material is suspended in saidsprayable asphalt emulsion in an amount of from about 9% to about 27% byweight of a total final weight of said sprayable coating composition. 2.The sprayable coating composition of claim 1, wherein said sprayableasphalt emulsion comprises a cationic asphalt emulsion.
 3. The sprayablecoating composition of claim 1, wherein 100% of said aggregate materialwill pass a #16 US sieve.
 4. The sprayable coating composition of claim1, further comprising clay.
 5. The sprayable coating composition ofclaim 1, further comprising at least one of clay, a mineral filler,polymer latex, rheological enhancers and stabilizers, biocide orpreservative, and water.
 6. The sprayable coating composition of claim1, wherein said aggregate material is selected from expanded calcinedslate, calcined shale, crushed boiler slag, crushed trap rock, or acombination thereof.
 7. The sprayable coating composition of claim 1,wherein said aggregate material is a fractured expanded calcined slate.8. The sprayable coating composition of claim 1, wherein: 100% of saidaggregate material will pass a number 16 US sieve and not more than 20%by weight of said aggregate material will pass a number 200 US sieve. 9.The sprayable coating composition of claim 1, wherein said aggregatematerial is suspended in said sprayable asphalt emulsion in an amount offrom about 11% to about 25% by weight of said total final weight of saidsprayable coating composition.
 10. The sprayable coating composition ofclaim 1, wherein said aggregate material is suspended in said sprayableasphalt emulsion in an amount of about 18% by weight of said total finalweight of said sprayable coating composition.
 11. A method of coating anasphalt surface comprising the step of spraying a coating compositiononto said asphalt surface, said coating composition comprising: asprayable asphalt emulsion and an aggregate material, wherein saidaggregate material is suspended in said sprayable asphalt emulsion in anamount of from about 9% to about 27% by weight of a total final weightof said coating composition.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein saidsprayable asphalt emulsion comprises a cationic asphalt emulsion. 13.The method of claim 11, wherein 100% of said aggregate material willpass a number #16 US sieve.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein saidcoating composition further comprises clay.
 15. The method of claim 11,wherein said coating composition further comprises at least one of clay,a mineral filler, polymer latex, rheological enhancers and stabilizers,biocide or preservative, and water.
 16. The method of claim 11, whereinsaid aggregate material is selected from expanded calcined slate,calcined shale, crushed boiler slag, crushed trap rock, or a combinationthereof.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein said aggregate material isa fractured expanded calcined slate.
 18. The method of claim 11,wherein: 100% of said graded aggregate material will pass a number 16 USsieve, and from 0% to 10% by weight of said graded aggregate materialwill pass a number 200 US sieve.
 19. The method of claim 11, whereinsaid aggregate material is suspended in said sprayable asphalt emulsionin an amount of from about 11% to about 25% by weight of said totalfinal weight of said coating composition.
 20. The method of claim 11,wherein said aggregate material is suspended in said sprayable asphaltemulsion in an amount of about 18% by weight of said total final weightof said coating composition.